MyFAQ vs Tenderbolt
Tenderbolt is the closest thing to a direct European neighbour in this comparison, and the overlap is real: both are AI-native, both host in Europe, both take GDPR seriously as a product requirement rather than a compliance page. Tenderbolt's distinctive strength is depth in French public procurement — it understands DCE, CCTP and RC formats, which is specialist knowledge and genuinely hard to replicate. MyFAQ's is breadth: six interface languages rather than two, answers in 140+, a choice of EU or US data region, and published pricing.
French public-sector tenders are the core of your business and native handling of DCE, CCTP and RC formats is worth more to you than broader language and region coverage.
you respond across several European markets and languages, need a choice of data region, sell more than one product, or want to see the price before the first call.
What Tenderbolt is genuinely good at
- Real depth in French public procurement, including DCE, CCTP and RC document formats.
- European hosting and GDPR-compliant infrastructure as a founding assumption.
- Tender analysis that surfaces requirements quickly from a large buyer package.
- A clear focus on a well-defined market rather than trying to be everything.
Where MyFAQ is different
Buyer context never becomes your proof.
Your prospect's RFP shapes how an answer is written — its tone, its scope, its terminology. It never counts as evidence that you hold a capability. The two roles are separated and labelled in every citation, and on shared channels the buyer's material is excluded from the answer entirely.
Your data region, your languages.
Choose EU or US at sign-up; documents, questionnaires, indexes and history stay there. Six interface languages, answers in 140+, and evidence written in one language can answer a question asked in another — so you don't maintain one library per market.
The right product's evidence answers.
MyFAQ reads the whole questionnaire to work out which product or module is under review, then prefers evidence for that subject. If you sell more than one thing, this is the difference between a true answer and a true answer about the wrong product.
No librarian required.
Categories, languages and descriptions are set on upload. Text inside scanned pages and screenshots becomes searchable. Near-duplicate Q&A merges instead of piling up. An uploaded spreadsheet is routed by what's actually in it — completed questionnaire, data table, or a form that still needs answering.
Feature comparison
| Comparison dimension | MyFAQ | Tenderbolt |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricing | $50 / $100 / $200 per month | Not published — demo required |
| Free entry | First month free | Not documented publicly |
| Interface languages | 6 (EN, FR, DE, ES, IT, PT-BR) | 2 (EN, FR) |
| Answer languages | 140+ | EN, FR |
| Data region | EU or US, chosen at registration | European hosting |
| Cross-language evidence reuse | Yes | Partial |
| French public procurement formats (DCE, CCTP, RC) | General document handling | Native, specialist |
| Buyer package analysed into a structured brief | Yes | Yes |
| Buyer context separated from company evidence | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Multi-product evidence selection | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Excel questionnaire automation with formatting preserved | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Per-question review with assignment and audit trail | Yes | Partial |
| Assistant in Teams and Google Chat | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Self-serve start | Yes | Demo-led |
Competitor information last verified: September 13, 2026. MyFAQ figures are published list prices for a whole-company subscription. Competitor figures are quote-based unless marked as published; medians are drawn from independent buyer-transaction data, not from list price.
Pricing
FAQ Starter
$50/mo
5000 credits · up to 5 users · 25 documents
FAQ Standard
$100/mo
10000 credits · up to 10 users · 50 documents
FAQ Enterprise
$200/mo
20000 credits · up to 20 users · 100 documents
1,000 additional credits for $10 (or €10), on any plan. First month free on every plan.
One subscription per company — never priced per user. Credits are shared across all company users.
When Tenderbolt is the better choice
If your revenue comes from French public tenders, Tenderbolt's format-level knowledge of that process is a specialist asset and we would rather you had the right tool than ours. Their focus is a feature, not a limitation, for a company whose market is exactly that one.
When teams move to MyFAQ
When the market is European rather than French — a company selling into Germany, Spain, Italy and France needs six interface languages, not two, and needs a German tender answered from an English policy library without maintaining a parallel German one. When the work is private-sector RFPs and security questionnaires rather than public tenders. And when a buyer wants US residency for a US subsidiary while keeping EU residency for the parent.
Already on Tenderbolt?
Export your content library, upload it, and answer a real questionnaire the same day. First month free.
Run both in parallel on one live questionnaire before you decide. It's the only test that means anything.
FAQ
Are both GDPR-compliant?
Both host in Europe and treat GDPR as a design requirement. MyFAQ additionally lets you choose EU or US at registration, with documents, questionnaires, indexes and history staying in the selected region.
Which supports more languages?
MyFAQ — six interface languages and answers in 140+, versus English and French.
Does MyFAQ handle French public tenders?
MyFAQ analyses a buyer package into a structured brief and answers questionnaires in French, and its interface is available in French. For the specific document conventions of French public procurement, Tenderbolt has invested more deeply — if that is your core market, evaluate both on a real dossier.
Does Tenderbolt publish pricing?
No; pricing requires a demo booking.
Sources
- English and French; European hosting; DCE/CCTP/RC formats; pricing via demo only — tenderbolt.ai/en/solutions/rfp, verified 2026-09-13
All product names, logos and brands are property of their respective owners. Comparisons are based on publicly available information as of the dates shown.