MyFAQ vs AutogenAI
AutogenAI and MyFAQ solve adjacent problems and it is worth being clear about which is which. AutogenAI is built for narrative proposal writing at enterprise and federal scale — long-form bid documents drafted inside Microsoft Word, with FedRAMP High authorisation for US federal work. MyFAQ is built for the questionnaire side of the same job: RFIs, DDQs, security questionnaires and structured RFP response grids, answered from your approved evidence with citations attached, then reviewed question by question. If your bids are mostly prose, AutogenAI is designed for that. If your bids arrive as spreadsheets with four hundred rows, MyFAQ is.
your work is long-form narrative proposal writing, especially US federal, and Word-native drafting with FedRAMP High matters.
your volume is structured questionnaires and compliance forms, you need published pricing, or you need EU data residency and multilingual responses.
What AutogenAI is genuinely good at
- Narrative proposal drafting with a Microsoft Word add-in — the tool sits where proposal writers already work.
- End-to-end proposal support from qualification through submission.
- FedRAMP High authorisation, which is a hard requirement for US federal work and not something most of this market has.
- Enterprise-scale bid organisations with heavy prose output.
Where MyFAQ is different
Buyer context never becomes your proof.
Your prospect's RFP shapes how an answer is written — its tone, its scope, its terminology. It never counts as evidence that you hold a capability. The two roles are separated and labelled in every citation, and on shared channels the buyer's material is excluded from the answer entirely.
Your data region, your languages.
Choose EU or US at sign-up; documents, questionnaires, indexes and history stay there. Six interface languages, answers in 140+, and evidence written in one language can answer a question asked in another — so you don't maintain one library per market.
The right product's evidence answers.
MyFAQ reads the whole questionnaire to work out which product or module is under review, then prefers evidence for that subject. If you sell more than one thing, this is the difference between a true answer and a true answer about the wrong product.
No librarian required.
Categories, languages and descriptions are set on upload. Text inside scanned pages and screenshots becomes searchable. Near-duplicate Q&A merges instead of piling up. An uploaded spreadsheet is routed by what's actually in it — completed questionnaire, data table, or a form that still needs answering.
Feature comparison
| Comparison dimension | MyFAQ | AutogenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary strength | Structured questionnaires, DDQs, security forms | Long-form narrative proposals |
| Published pricing | $50 / $100 / $200 per month | Quote-based, enterprise |
| Excel questionnaire automation with formatting preserved | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Non-standard spreadsheet layouts | Handled, with a review step when unclear | Not documented publicly |
| Per-question review queue with assignment | Yes | Partial |
| Buyer context separated from company evidence | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Multi-product evidence selection | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Data region chosen at sign-up | EU or US | Not documented publicly |
| US federal authorisation | Not applicable — MyFAQ does not offer US federal authorisation | FedRAMP High |
| Interface languages | 6 | Not documented publicly |
| Assistant in Teams and Google Chat | Yes | Not documented publicly |
| Self-serve start | Yes, first month free | Not documented publicly |
Competitor information last verified: September 13, 2026. MyFAQ figures are published list prices for a whole-company subscription. Competitor figures are quote-based unless marked as published; medians are drawn from independent buyer-transaction data, not from list price.
Pricing
FAQ Starter
$50/mo
5000 credits · up to 5 users · 25 documents
FAQ Standard
$100/mo
10000 credits · up to 10 users · 50 documents
FAQ Enterprise
$200/mo
20000 credits · up to 20 users · 100 documents
1,000 additional credits for $10 (or €10), on any plan. First month free on every plan.
One subscription per company — never priced per user. Credits are shared across all company users.
When AutogenAI is the better choice
US federal contracting where FedRAMP High is a gate — that is decisive and no amount of other capability substitutes for it. Organisations whose output is predominantly long-form prose written in Word, where a drafting assistant inside the document is worth more than a questionnaire pipeline. And large proposal organisations that want a single enterprise platform for narrative bids and have the budget for it.
When teams move to MyFAQ
Often they run both, which is a perfectly reasonable outcome. The trigger for adding MyFAQ is usually questionnaire volume: security questionnaires and DDQs arriving as spreadsheets, which a narrative drafting tool is not shaped for. The trigger for replacing is usually European operations — data residency plus responses in German, French or Spanish, at published rather than enterprise pricing.
Already on AutogenAI?
Export your content library, upload it, and answer a real questionnaire the same day. First month free.
Run both in parallel on one live questionnaire before you decide. It's the only test that means anything.
FAQ
Does AutogenAI publish pricing?
No. It is quote-based enterprise pricing; independent estimates suggest five-figure annual commitments.
Can MyFAQ write long-form proposal narrative?
MyFAQ generates an executive-ready summary deliverable from the approved brief, the questionnaire responses, coverage gaps and admissible evidence. Its core strength is structured questionnaire answering with per-question review — if your primary need is drafting a sixty-page prose bid in Word, say so on the call and we will tell you honestly whether we're the right fit.
Which is better for security questionnaires?
MyFAQ. It is built around spreadsheet questionnaires, preserves workbook formatting and formulas on return, and routes every answer through a per-question review workflow.
Can we use both?
Yes, and some teams do — AutogenAI for the narrative volumes, MyFAQ for the questionnaire volumes.
Sources
- Word add-in; qualification-to-submission; FedRAMP High; quote-based — sifthub.io/best-ai-rfp-software, verified 2026-09-13
All product names, logos and brands are property of their respective owners. Comparisons are based on publicly available information as of the dates shown.